Hi US-foosers,
I've had a little conversation with UK's Boris Atha about the pros and cons of the Snake Shot and the Euro-Pin. As I began to pepper him with more and more questions, he suggested posting the stuff in the Britfoos-Forum, and I thought it wouldn't be amiss if I put it in here as well.
So this is how where we got so far, please let me know what you think about it:
As a newbie from Germany, I'd like to use the opportunity of getting opinions from members of another "foos-culture". As you might know, most guys in Germany use variations of the Euro-Pin, and some players even frown on the Snake Shot (don't ask me why, since it's not entirely clear to me). Thus, it's not easy to get an unbiased statement about advantages and drawbacks of either shot. But with the increasing spread of hollow rods and American Foos-videos the Snake Shot players are growing in numbers, and the question which shot is "better" has become a big issue in German Foosball-forums.
My question: I'm currently trying to figure out which shot I should practice. I'm a total beginner and want to learn something that helps me win (against other beginners). I play on a Leonhart Homesoccer with solid rods at the office. (This table is the home version of the Original Soccer and similar to the Lehmacher P4P. For those who don't know either of them: It's much closer to the Garlando than to the Tornado, but it's softer and offers more ball control, mostly because of the ball itself.)
Most comments and articles I've read say that the easiest shot for beginners is the Snake Shot. So I tried practicing it, but it keeps feeling awkward. Then I tried the Euro-Pin - and to my astonishment, it seems to work right from the start. It just seems like it takes less effort to get the shot into one single, fluid motion, whereas the Snake stays jerky and laterally slow (perhaps because of the heavy rods?).
What do you think about those techniques compared to each other? Is it really all about on which table you play? On a Tornado, how can the Snake Shot be easier than the Euro-Pin, considering that this table provides little control (compared to the German tables) and the lateral movement has to be achieved using the wrist instead of the palm? Seems paradox to me. Same goes for shots for beginners: How can the snake shot be easier? Why does everyone say that? I’m confused.
And this was Boris' answer, to which I, in turn, replied:
Most people use the wrist for the snake shot, as when the rollover is completed the rod can be grasped naturally preventing a spin. It is one of the shots which, when learned, can become effective very quickly whereas other shots tend to start off slowly and speed/accuracy/effectiveness improves over time.
I still wonder why this is so; to me, the movement of the Snake seems pretty complicated, mostly because of the recoil. Would you agree with me when I say that without the recoil, the Snake Shot is practically useless?
As to the Pin Shot, the recoil seems to be more like a "natural" part of the movement and doesn't have to be executed deliberately. Any experiences with that?
Boris:
The snake is superior to pin on Tornado at present because the balls are hard and there is less grip than with european foot/ball/playfield combinations. The balls are also heavy (c28g) which means that more effort is required to change direction so a walking pin is slower. With the snake and pull shots which dominate on Tornado lateral movement is in one direction.
These words were most helpful to me because they cleared up a misunderstanding: When you (and obviously most of the authors on the internet) talk about the Pin Shot, you mean the whole tactical system of the movements that can become involved using this technique, like walking the ball and going long lateral distances.
I, in contrast, was only referring to the technique as such, like when you're practicing: Pin the ball, move it to one side and shoot it in. So I was comparing the Snake and the Pin on a level where the trajectory of the ball would be the same.
By this rationale, I'd say that, while using the Pin Shot, since you control the handle with your palm instead of your wrist, there should be an advantage over the Snake Shot especially on tables that hinder ball control. What do you think about that?
Boris :
So in summary I would say that the snake gives you speed and power, whereas the pin gives slightly less speed/power but more versatility and finesse.
I'm new to the game, but from what I've experienced so far, lateral speed is far more important than a super powerful shot. So what I'm practicing right now is basically a Snake Shot system with a Euro Pin technique: Pin the ball in the middle, quickly move it to one of the corners and shoot it in. The reason why I do this is because I find it much easier to get the ball to one side with my palm controlling the rod (instead of my wrist). In my opinion, there's no need for walking the ball if the shot is quick enough, but should it be case one day that I'll want to incorporate walking the ball into my game, I'll be prepared for it since I'll already be using an appropriate technique.
Why don't I just go for the kind of Pin Shot all the Lehmacher players use? Because I want to learn something that I could transfer to a Tornado when I need to.
Would you say this is good thinking? Or have I again fallen victim to a misunderstanding?
So I’d really appreciate to hear your opinion about that issue, and you’d do the Kraut-foosers a big favour if you could go a little into detail concerning the various aspects of the Snake vs. Euro Pin “problem”.