Iceman,
good to hear you are okay and its good you are back
what you describe with the Techball is what I have wanted for Tornado since coming back 4 1/2 years ago
Tornado table changes was the topic of my very first post on Ezboard
this leads me to the idea about equipment standars
I have said it on here too, the game needs recoginized equipment standards especially since there are so many competition tables
I don't think all the tables should play exactly the same, just like Tennis with hard surface, clay, grass and even changes within each of these but there are standards for the demensions of the court, height of net, ball, rackets, etc ... same with all sports
foosball has tables with each differnet size play fields, balls, rods, handles, foot size, goal, etc...I think some should have absolute standards like play field size and goal size (width, height, and shape) and the others I think need to have minimums and maximums and as soon as possible approved materials
as an example the ball...I think this should either take the route of the tennis ball or baseball with very tight almost absolute standards or at the very least have a size standard and weight range and again eventually when more is know, a material guidelines and/or absolutes
I think I would seriously consider if telescoping rods should be allowed for competiton play and I further think a table should be able to pass certain tests which prove it to have a minimum stability during games so the table does move all over the place when Billy steps up rips a pull shot...watching the video of Billy shooting a pull on Bonzini for example, I thought the table was going to explode
anyway, this is a hot button for me so I am glad to hear there is at least one table that can support all shots and play styles
I pretty much said the same back in November on this site on this thread
http://www.foosball.com/forum/index.php?topic=1301.msg4254#msg4254however, like pretty much every other sport, I think there should be standards and/or tolerances like playfield (size, approved materials, level), rod specs (length, diameter, weight, material), Men (foot size/shape, height from table, distance from each other) , side strip (size, etc) , bumpers, handles (size, material, changeable, etc) , ball (length, diameter, weight, material), table height/weight (and other dimensions), score/game/time out posts, and finally goal size (height, width, shape).
The trick is to do this and still allow each table to retain its own unique personality...I think it can be done if the key requirements provide the right tolerances and/or variables (like available material for man, table surface, and balls).
I am totally cool with the idea of the best player being determined by who can play best on a variety of tables…Fredrico has shown that he is the best (ever in my opinion) because he dominates on every table and has for 10 years or more.
I just think the players should NOT have to deal with things like the table surface not being level or the ball not being round or widely varying goal sizes or table weight. Lets build solid heavy tables (at least 400 pounds) for tournament competition that are level and have balls that stay round or are replaced often enough not to matter. I also think the size of the goal should be consistent…could you imagine football uprights each being a different width, or soccer goals, or hockey, or basket ball, or any well known sport where goals are scored?
No, there should be standards.