Foosball.com Forums

1

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

1
« on: February 10, 2009, 02:18:09 PM »
1
« Last Edit: March 29, 2009, 01:07:11 PM by Snake Shot Blows »

Offline bbtuna

  • 1465
  • TS, Dynamo, Tornado, Warrior, & Fireball
Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2009, 05:50:44 PM »
well, its the old system and the new ElO mixing...the ELO will straighten things out as more tournaments are put in the system...part of it is that people brought points from the old system, some earned from top play, other earned from going to enough tournaments, but ELO will sort that out eventually, you gotta give it more time

plus, there are some issues with data and still an occasional logic issue which is worked out when they get good detailed fact-based feedback

its a very complex system but when the details are worked out and enough tournament data is added, it will become very solid

it is used in other sports/games and can be very accurate...after time, you will have to be really good to move up and you will have to win quite a bit and if you sort of do and sort of don't you will sort of stay where you are

i know it is built so you go down a little slower now than you go up so you don't pull someone out of a category and play them down one when they really shouldn't be there yet...there is some logic on how long a person should stay at a certain rank if they are not playing but I don't rememeber exactly how it works

lots of past threads on that detail on the other board which you could probably find if youdid a search under ELO

Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2009, 05:06:30 AM »
Quote
well, its the old system and the new ElO mixing...the ELO will straighten things out as more tournaments are put in the system

first off, its "Elo" a person's name= Arpad Elo

i beleive they did a reset BEFORE implementing the Elo system ,so there is no "carrying over" of past player's over-ratings that were gained under the old way of doing things in order not to taint the new data going forward

Foosline.com has an Elo PDF article explaining it
http://www.foosline.com/Elo.pdf



Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2009, 05:20:30 AM »
The problem for the majority will continue with the ELO system unless it is updated after each and every event.
This will allow the ELO system to settle out much faster and give a more accurate indication to a players Doubles and Singles strength against the field. We've been using it for 9 years now and it is the best anti-sandbagging component we have. But it has to be updated more frequently than what is currently being done. The software we currently use does that for us, so players typically check out the new points list 2 weeks after our events to search for potential partners.

It would probably benefit to have certain geographically blanced events designated as ELO updated event to help balance the entire U.S. players base in a faster amount of time. 2 event in the North, 2 in the South and so forth.


later

AC


Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2009, 05:48:58 AM »
The Elo-Ranking of the P4P-Players in Germany is updated 1 day after each tournament. Why should it take any longer?

Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2009, 09:16:09 AM »
Body Groove,

You guys are fast.

I'm just too old to get it done any faster :D
AC


Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2009, 09:40:39 AM »
Alan,

maybe the P4P guys are using a better software or something? I'm sure they would be willing to help you if you ask them.

Cheerz

Pat

Offline PatRyan

  • *****
  • 383
  • www.usatablesoccer.org
Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2009, 01:25:26 PM »
The problem with entering the results into the point system, here in the US, is that there isn't just ONE piece of software being used to run all of the tournaments, there is currently at least 4-5 different programs. 

Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2009, 03:28:59 AM »
Yeah, like what to expect from a nation that still refuses to use the metric system...

 ;D

Offline foozkillah

  • 764
  • Sure Ain't A Livin'
Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2009, 05:16:13 AM »
The problem with entering the results into the point system, here in the US, is that there isn't just ONE piece of software being used to run all of the tournaments, there is currently at least 4-5 different programs. 

Being a former coder m'self... that is not a problem, if you look at it from a reliability and durability point of view.  You then have 4-5 separate tests of more ideas and more hypotheses in the actual applications.  The "herd" mindedness of other more indoctrinated cultures can definitely lead to faster domination of one picked alternative, and of course, the loss of the information and experience gleaned from more than one point of view on any subject.  Farthest thing from the American experience, which is very much more independent thinking and more varied experimentation.  Obviously a bad thing for Americans, because it made them come up with things like electrification, telephony, portable calculators, mass-produced cars and other thingamajiggies, computers, passable moon travel, binary simplified calculation & execution, personal computers, and most important of all .... permaprest pants, talking pictures, and the TV remote.

Now all these things pale, of course, in comparison to others that came before, from other civilizations, like writing, running water, sorta cooked food, torture dungeons, nifty astrology, dingy castle/sooty mudhuts/stinky tents living...  but we can all see how hard it was to sell that stuff...  never any sales or discount club coupons.  What fun were they?

And the free-er thinking way will almost certainly actually give North American record keeping an edge, because what was technologically sufficient, even superior, for a few years, is continuously and inevitably obsoleted by this planet's new paradigm: death, tax refunds, bailouts and even more change in all of the above.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2009, 05:40:06 AM by foozkillah »

Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2009, 05:58:47 AM »
@Brian


Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2009, 01:16:53 PM »
Alan,

maybe the P4P guys are using a better software or something? I'm sure they would be willing to help you if you ask them.

Cheerz

Pat

I talked a bit with Heinrich about the system they use and it appears the guy who wrote the main thing left and now they're working with a mess of a code-mix and doing any modification in it is pretty a struggle in itself...
So I don't think they'll be able to help a lot... :-(

But yeah they're pretty fast uploading the results and having the trackback of all matches you played is great ! Lets you remember some matches you forgot, and also define your worst (or favourite) "ennemies" on the table :P

Offline foozkillah

  • 764
  • Sure Ain't A Livin'
Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2009, 11:26:53 PM »
The Elo-Ranking of the P4P-Players in Germany is updated 1 day after each tournament. Why should it take any longer?

Yeah, Patrick,

Are the Tecball Elo rankings also updated as fast?  Or is there room for some "ahem!" underranked upsets in Tecball?  Not sure if they play a lot of handicapped games in Tecball, either...  We only know the bit that Mark Winker and Tom Yore can tell us from the Tecball tourneys in Germany.

Ach Der Liebe!  Typical admirable Teutonic efficiency and precision, even with thousands of league players.  No wonder those BMW's and Mercedes's are just that bit better than the Peugeots and Citroens...  ;D ;D ;D

Offline foozkillah

  • 764
  • Sure Ain't A Livin'
Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2009, 11:31:53 PM »
And just a little bit better, no?

I wonder what Farid drives?  ;D  Perhaps he likes to walk, living near work, and walk to his 2hour lunches and 4hour dinners..  Which may be long, but are vitally important, so he can discuss what other critical changes are needed for other countries' foosball rules and procedures. 8)

Re: What's wrong with the rating system ?
« Reply #14 on: February 14, 2009, 07:02:58 AM »
Brian,

Am I oversensitive or is there a little bit of a xenophobic subtext in your postings?  ::) :-\

I'm not sure about the DTFB rating system. I just know that the one P4P uses is working pretty well, so I thought it might serve as an example or a model for other associations (I didn't know they, too, were facing problems). It has nothing to do with general teutonic efficiency, even though, as Phil once rightly remarked, Germans tend to be anal about this kind of stuff.

By the way, I'm not into cars at all. If a was a millionaire, I'd buy a 1968 Mustang Fastback, or even a Shelby GT. To me, advanced technology isn't everything...