In deference to not hijacking the original thread about hoping Shelti would take over Tornado-Valley:
Brian,
From what I was told, they are manufacturing in the U.S. and would phase out of the Asian manufacturing market.
There's an interesting thread by Arthur Mitchell on the foosballboard to the ITSF.
Take a look and see what you think.
We had played with the idea of sanctioning a few ITSF events where there was no prize money awarded and a single elimination format. Since it breaksdown to a points chasing game anyway, we were going make it a free eventsfor points and get the thing out of the way of the focus of our traditional events. We were going to have to appease the points chasers with the ITSF ball and maintain the majority of the players with the corkball which in turn gave us more financial stability in covering payouts, expenses and charitable donations. It really starting taking the fun out of foosball events for us. The decision to stop ITSF sanctioning because of ball issues and withdrawing from USTSF sanctioning until the financial use of Bonzini U.S.A. players fees is discussed was easy. We are still having tournaments, we are still selling tables and we are still having fun with foosball.
I guess this is a highjacked thread. Sorry.
Later,
AC
NC Foosball Open in 2 weeks!
Alan,
Your group's decision to forego continued ITSF sanctioning for the benefit of your own group's purposes MAY be the best example for Tornado-Valley to look at. There definitely is life after loss of sanction by the USTSF and the ITSF. Bonzini-USA is still for Bonzini-USA.
Your scheduled functions and charities and general aims and mission are still running full well and quite healthy, from the looks of their participation. And although I really would not be hurt by this upcoming conversion to single-goal figure rods and a more homogenized, eventually ubiquitous common world table, due to my formative foos years on about 9 or so other tables on 4 continents, JUST THE THOUGHT of having outside influences, with absolutely no care nor thought for US Domestic foos, getting so much input and influence, galls me to no end.
With the onrush of complaints from Brit and Euro players on this and foosballboard.com about why their top-ranked players should be ranked so high at pro and promaster at US events, when they seem to insist that the typical pro or even promaster-rated Euro or Brit player would only be rated high expert or semipro here, it seems like Tornado and the USTSF have done the same things as if the NBA had decided to change its rules and specifications to match European league basketball and allowed their refs and/or officials any kind of standing in NBA league or promotional events play ... ie... utterly inane and stupid.
And yes, I do agree with those Euro and Brit players. The league system they foster in Europe, despite the 10s of thousands of members they profess to have, is similar to the true league bowling and billiards and darts leagues we have here. These leagues are built to encourage regular weekly and more play, with tremendous handicapping to promote very equilateral enjoyment down to the rookie or beginner levels, and not a lot of pressure to win out. Domestic US foosball, INCLUDING YOUR BONZINI tournaments and events, are basically money games closer to professional tournaments. The weeklies are definitely for much smaller pots than other pro sports/games, but definitely (in IRS terms) money games that absolutely and mercilessly promote winning out and finishing consistently, in order to make headway vs just bleeding money and costs. Much more mercenary, much more professional-like. Which is also why I believe that North American foosball, based on money given to the elite or best & most consistent, which welcomes many beginners to the mix by throwing them to the wolves, results in a much HARDER, more BRUTALLY CONSISTENT top cadre of players, whether they play on Tornados, Warriors, Bonzinis or Cammons(?) or Sheltis.
I would, IMHO, say the difference between the majority of US pro and higher players to their counterparts in the Euro leagues is exactly the same as the difference between professional pool and professional TV bowling players versus the higher ranks of the APA or Valley pool leagues and the higher ranks of the thousand-plus or so domestic bowling leagues. A very discernible difference AND MINDSET.
In other words, if one took the US's top ten TV pool or bowling pros and put them up against the top ten league champions from across the country, the league players would put up a fight, but the pros would win out, given neutral playing fields or tables. The same with US domestic foosball "League" and tour players used to playing money games every week, even everyday, vs the top European league champions on a neutral table. Including your Bonzini-USA player "leagues," US domestic foosball leagues and groups are closer to poker leagues and groups. THEY ARE MONEY PLAYERS, honed for sometimes decades on a WEEKLY, EVEN DAILY or NIGHTLY basis, AND ARE DESIGNED TO ROB THE BANK, PIMP THE WIFE AND DAUGHTER, SELL THE SON, MUG GRANDMA, AND ANYTHING ELSE TO WIN, AS BEST AS POSSIBLE. Which is exactly what those Euro and Brit players are saying. I believe them.. at least on weekly or nightly money tables like Tornado or Warrior or whatever.
Playing one or more weeklies for years in North America is akin to going one or more times a week to the classic old Western-style cowboy and mining-town saloon or riverboat casino, to play poker for money and getting drunk on gin and whiskey, sometimes getting shot at. Not quite like your weekly Saturday family-night bowling league outing. Or even better, not quite like playing in a weekly 10,000 member Euro league for a chance to get free entries to that even bigger VIFA style event, at the neighboring European capital city, a mind-numbing 200 or so kilometers away.